<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Family Jewels, part two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=994</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A</title>
		<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=994&#038;cpage=1#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=994#comment-971</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with him, but would like to see Ice Warriors.

Everything else I&#039;m happy to be led by. It may be that budgets and shooting restrictions limit options on, say, historical pieces or full-on Rutan tooting space war scenes, but I reckon we can count on Moffat to be clever at least, and that might mean judicious use of current resources and not blowng the kitty on a guest star or something.

I&#039;m rambling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with him, but would like to see Ice Warriors.</p>
<p>Everything else I&#8217;m happy to be led by. It may be that budgets and shooting restrictions limit options on, say, historical pieces or full-on Rutan tooting space war scenes, but I reckon we can count on Moffat to be clever at least, and that might mean judicious use of current resources and not blowng the kitty on a guest star or something.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m rambling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad Ritchards</title>
		<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=994&#038;cpage=1#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad Ritchards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=994#comment-968</guid>
		<description>These quotes make me interested in what will be left out. Will we no longer have... if we dare to ask... no more Daleks? Or Cybermen? I doubt Moffat will go that extreme, but I can see them being more relaxed. (I was about to say &#039;none in the new year one&#039;, but they might just because it is a new series and they need some sense of &#039;this is Doctor Who&#039; which equates to &#039;Daleks&#039;.

What about arcs? The line &quot;making nostalgia&quot; could imply that there will be more recurring new things, but as an arc? I don&#039;t think Doctor Who needs it, but are the NuWho audience unable to do without? I hope Moffat is able to think more highly of them than Rusty did.

Ultimately, what do I want? Damn good stories! I don&#039;t have a wishlist, except for that one demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These quotes make me interested in what will be left out. Will we no longer have&#8230; if we dare to ask&#8230; no more Daleks? Or Cybermen? I doubt Moffat will go that extreme, but I can see them being more relaxed. (I was about to say &#8216;none in the new year one&#8217;, but they might just because it is a new series and they need some sense of &#8216;this is Doctor Who&#8217; which equates to &#8216;Daleks&#8217;.</p>
<p>What about arcs? The line &#8220;making nostalgia&#8221; could imply that there will be more recurring new things, but as an arc? I don&#8217;t think Doctor Who needs it, but are the NuWho audience unable to do without? I hope Moffat is able to think more highly of them than Rusty did.</p>
<p>Ultimately, what do I want? Damn good stories! I don&#8217;t have a wishlist, except for that one demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
