<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quite Right, too.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=77" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=77</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A</title>
		<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=77&#038;cpage=1#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=77#comment-151</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s been no word yet that RTD is going anywhere too soon. In fact recent interviews suggest he has plenty of steam left for however many years the series will have him.

I support most of what he&#039;s done, speaking for myself - it&#039;s hard to argue with the audience figures and the buzz around &#039;the kids&#039;. There&#039;s no doubt in my mind however that when he does step down the show (if it&#039;s still going) will change markedly.

Er, wasn&#039;t RTD pretty much the pulling power behind it coming back? besides Lorraine Heggesay&#039;s strong hints that the BBC was looking for a solid Saturday night show to family audiences. Just my hunc, but committees very rarely come up with that logical a conclusion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been no word yet that RTD is going anywhere too soon. In fact recent interviews suggest he has plenty of steam left for however many years the series will have him.</p>
<p>I support most of what he&#8217;s done, speaking for myself &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to argue with the audience figures and the buzz around &#8216;the kids&#8217;. There&#8217;s no doubt in my mind however that when he does step down the show (if it&#8217;s still going) will change markedly.</p>
<p>Er, wasn&#8217;t RTD pretty much the pulling power behind it coming back? besides Lorraine Heggesay&#8217;s strong hints that the BBC was looking for a solid Saturday night show to family audiences. Just my hunc, but committees very rarely come up with that logical a conclusion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad Ritchards</title>
		<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=77&#038;cpage=1#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad Ritchards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=77#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Is RTD still at the helm for S4? &quot;Popular recieved wisdom&quot; dictates that the series will fall apart if he ever leaves. (Because, you know, he was the sole and only reason for it coming back just like only one person was responsible for the entirety of the old series...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is RTD still at the helm for S4? &#8220;Popular recieved wisdom&#8221; dictates that the series will fall apart if he ever leaves. (Because, you know, he was the sole and only reason for it coming back just like only one person was responsible for the entirety of the old series&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
