<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Return &#8211; April 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=1521</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=1521&#038;cpage=1#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 09:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=1521#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>Hammer, don&#039;t hurt him - aren&#039;t we elder Statesfans too? (or at least middle-aged Statesfans)

As for the Norton virus - wasn&#039;t that him playing the Dream Lord (I&#039;m not spoilering, we&#039;ve all seen the &#039;next time&#039; trailer by now)?

Lastly, I suppose I should indicate an elephant in the room.  I know we&#039;ve all noticed, but no-one seems to want to say.  We&#039;ve lost Tennant, Rusty, coral columns, the chunky, rivetty daleks and... the consistently gorgeous visual effects we&#039;d all come to depend upon.  There have been notable exceptions (spitfires in space!) and there are doubtless solid, budgetary reasons why - but in the final analysis does it really matter?  
As a 3-D computer artist said to me: &quot;it&#039;s just like Doctor Who used to be, iffy effects but great characters and stories!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hammer, don&#8217;t hurt him &#8211; aren&#8217;t we elder Statesfans too? (or at least middle-aged Statesfans)</p>
<p>As for the Norton virus &#8211; wasn&#8217;t that him playing the Dream Lord (I&#8217;m not spoilering, we&#8217;ve all seen the &#8216;next time&#8217; trailer by now)?</p>
<p>Lastly, I suppose I should indicate an elephant in the room.  I know we&#8217;ve all noticed, but no-one seems to want to say.  We&#8217;ve lost Tennant, Rusty, coral columns, the chunky, rivetty daleks and&#8230; the consistently gorgeous visual effects we&#8217;d all come to depend upon.  There have been notable exceptions (spitfires in space!) and there are doubtless solid, budgetary reasons why &#8211; but in the final analysis does it really matter?<br />
As a 3-D computer artist said to me: &#8220;it&#8217;s just like Doctor Who used to be, iffy effects but great characters and stories!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad Ritchards</title>
		<link>https://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=1521&#038;cpage=1#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad Ritchards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusblog.tetrap.com/?p=1521#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>You can only complain about Fatima if you&#039;ve read &lt;em&gt;The Third Secret&lt;/em&gt;. I have and it wasn&#039;t pretty.

Canonicity of the computer games? May I just point out that he was photographed with the blue sonic?

And why isn&#039;t Babelcolour given huge buckets of money to do this professionally?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can only complain about Fatima if you&#8217;ve read <em>The Third Secret</em>. I have and it wasn&#8217;t pretty.</p>
<p>Canonicity of the computer games? May I just point out that he was photographed with the blue sonic?</p>
<p>And why isn&#8217;t Babelcolour given huge buckets of money to do this professionally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
