TSV 74
This time last year TSV began its regeneration from its former chatty self. Issue 74 features the latest change to the zine, the removal of a series news page, similarly the length of reviews (although still the largest component of the zine) has been reduced. So what’s making up the issue nowadays?
Let’s begin with the cover. A good, central image and focal point, although it does strike me as a tad generic; the third consecutive one in fact to scream ‘this never happened on the telly!’. No bad thing, but having done my fair share of illustrations like this, I’ve the feeling I’ve seen it all before. The back cover however is just lovely, and would have been a welcome front piece for a Survival review – hopefully earmarked for TSV 75 or, dare I say it, any feature on the McCoy Era.
Inside the illustrations are a step up from the wobbly lines of fanzines past, although the ‘Nth generation xerox-like’ Series 2 accompaniments lack any impact whatsoever, and Amy Mebberson’s cartoons for editorial and inside back cover, while very charming, needed some explanation on the message board as to who they represented, which is a pity following such a stunning online debut.
Beyond this the content is actually pretty varied once you take the reviews out: perhaps befitting the editor’s UK location and access to some of the show’s personnel there are two interviews, one of which could be reasonably filed under: Curious – but not earth-shattering. There’s also the continuing saga of David Lawrence’s long excursion through the EDAs. To call this a review would be to diminish it unnecessarily, as it’s David’s prose which keeps it moving along, and while they’re not my cup of tea, it’s good that the zine is still acknowledging other media this way. Audio reviews feature – although Paul McGann’s recent radio adventures are curiously overlooked, and Jon Preddle brings back Doctor’s Dilemma after a long absence, though it’s a quiet slip through the door rather than a fanfare and red carpet. Back in the ’90s you could be assured a little controversy with Jon’s regular piece, but I wonder whether in this age of Google and Wikipedia the reign of any Who oracle has passed? And speaking of such, Andrew Pixley gives us another of his exhaustive Missing Moments, this time from The Sea Devils. Not a story I’m greatly engaged by, and it’s telling that one of its excised scenes reveals the thrill of someone getting up from a chair, checking a monitor and sitting down again. Maybe my concentration span wasn’t built for such articles; but I did like the illustration Al! And Jamas’ drabbles were fun for me, a person with a limited attention span for fan fiction at the best of times.
The rest of TSV can be reliably summed up as reviews. There’s no way twenty years ago that even a six-monthly fanzine reviewing contemporary episodes would have been lumbered with twelve separate stories, so it must be acknowledged that some of TSV‘s repetition of these (the series, followed by the DVD releases) has to do with new series format. But something should address this in itself. TSV Being a bi-yearly zine we can expect this sort of carry-on every second issue. The zine is clearly swamped with the weight of new series material, edging out in this issue the original series DVD releases for one, but even this controlled pulling back is making reading a challenge, and if personal elements like a letters page and club update are being withdrawn to make room for reviews, then this can not be a good thing. A national fanzine has a responsibility to inform fans, document its achievements and help maintain its community. TSV won’t do this by series reviews and story files alone.
I see an occasion in a few years’ time where this issue of TSV might be looked at in retrospect to see what local fandom was busying itself with, and that investigation coming up rather lean. In fact, over the last twelve months of the life of the NZDWFC a reasonable amount has happened – a pretty serious dust-up on the message boards, the appearance of Zeus Plug and accompanying it the revival of the main centre chapters and fan gatherings. In short, we fans actually got together and did what you’d expect healthy creative fans to do. Six months down the track, and you’ll find no mention of this in the national fan club journal. Seemingly in dumping the new series news page TSV has also done away with the local news and sport.
So it’s another gradual shuffle forward. If the new series hit us like a double decker bus then TSV is gradually regaining its ability to walk. It will be a slow recovery. Next issue is the celebratory 75, surely an occasion to look back and tell that story about running issue one off on the University photocopier again. To paraphrase another thing that screened (and was overlooked) between issues, TSV 76 is where it’ll all happen, and the zine had better be ready.
PA

May 4th, 2007 at 7:19 pm
Re the two Amy Mebberson cartoons, whe I was adding this issue to the index, I noted them as cartoons of the Doctor and companion. I thought they looked a little like the Richard E Grant Doctor and Emma from Curse of Fatal Death. Was it explained on the message board in the end?
Also, I must have a go at Jamas’ drabble challenge…
May 4th, 2007 at 7:48 pm
Cartoons were explained on this very blog! (In the debated Radio Times post.) It’s Steven and Vicki of course!
May 4th, 2007 at 9:57 pm
Much as I’d like to offer my perspective on this review, I know from past experience that it’s best that I don’t offer an opinion on this topic.
What I will say though is that I would like to write something for the anniversary issue about the origins of TSV. I am of course aware that this isn’t the first time that this story has been told, so rather than regurgitate the same old material, I’m trying to find a slightly different angle, a more personal perspective, and include a number of details about the circumstances of its creation that have never appeared elsewhere.
Can I also point out that the webpage that link points to doesn’t make any mention of university photocopiers…?
Paul
May 4th, 2007 at 9:59 pm
I would also say to Adam (if he visits this site…?) bravo on dropping the news page (which was seriously redundant), but on the other hand… TWELVE Doctor Who Magazine reviews?! Come on…
May 4th, 2007 at 10:24 pm
Paul, you may certainly do so – I was aware that the story itself doesn’t appear on the History page, but we will be looking out for local contenders for ‘the Eyepatch Joke’ nevertheless!
Which is not to say you’re on a hiding to nothing with the 75th issue – we’ll be looking at RTP 24 as well in some form (I most likely won’t bre reviewer for obvious reasons), and as it has its 25th anniversary warning is due there also!
May 4th, 2007 at 11:30 pm
Maybe I shouldn’t even bother writing the article? In fact here’s an exclusive for Zeus Blog:
“A one-eyed look at TSV
by Paul Scoones
20 years ago, I snuck into the university photocopier room and ran off the very first copies of TSV. I was interrupted by a professor wanting to know what I was doing. I turned to explain and at that moment we realised that we were both wearing eyepatches. Oh how we laughed.”
Happy now?
May 5th, 2007 at 10:04 am
No bumping into a vicar wearing only your knickers during a TSV mail-out session?
May 5th, 2007 at 1:30 pm
I’m laughing fondly Paul, and I hope you are too.
You’re entireley within your rights to observe the 20th anniversary and TSV’s 75th issue the way you want to. If you’ll excuse us chorusing in with “and I turned around and they were all wearing eyepatches” on cue (should the cue arrive) then that would be cool too.
We’re fans, and fans do this.
Peter A
(Fourth-generation kiwi… cultural imperialism… whose history is it onscreen?… that’s not my cultural touchstone being referenced there… NZ fan with a non-UK point of reference… etc etc)
May 25th, 2007 at 7:46 pm
TSV is entitled to celebrate 20 years, I know RTP! would. I’ll be interested to see how it is done since we’ve already had “Decade”, which was a very fact-based look back. The annoucement that TARDIS Tales makes a return for TSV #75 suggests perhaps a more light-hearted, emotional look back.